Speaking to Canada’s National Post, Dr Djordjevic explained how he typically performs some 100 “gender reassignment” surgeries every year. But he’s now seeing many of these same patients coming back to him, begging to be “changed back” to what they were at birth – only to come to the stark realization that it’s not that simple.

“Those wishing the reversal have spoken to [me] about crippling levels of depression following their transition, and in some cases even contemplated suicide,” he says, noting that “reversing” back to one’s birth sex is both expensive and painful. “It can be a real disaster to hear these stories,” he adds, explaining that many such stories go unnoticed because of the “potentially politically incorrect” nature of bringing them up in today’s climate of total gender madness.

However, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is warning that many of the common additives in not just food but also packaging deserve closer scrutiny. The group recently released a policy statement and report in which they stated in no uncertain terms that many of these additives have devastating effects on people’s health – and children are especially vulnerable. They also called for the regulations governing these chemicals to be overhauled.

With more than 10,000 chemicals in the food that we eat, it simply isn’t practical to expect anyone to be able to separate the good from the bad. Therefore, the report singled out a few groups in particular, including phthalates, BPA, nitrates, PFCs, and artificial food colorings.

But are Tuesday’s results actually good news for Wall Street?

The times that we are moving into are not going to be anything like the “gridlock” that we witnessed during the Reagan, Clinton and Obama presidencies. During the Obama era, Republican leadership got along with the White House fairly well. And even though there was often some wrangling, Republicans almost always gave Obama most of what he wanted when it came to budget deals and other critical pieces of legislation.

Sadly, the next two years are going to be much different. It will be the political equivalent of trench warfare, and the carnage is going to be off the charts. There will be an all-out attempt to take down Trump and everyone around him, and Trump will respond by going after everyone that he perceives to be an enemy. In the end, a lot of politicians are not going to make it, and our system of governance will be badly damaged.

Many had been hoping that the midterm elections would resolve much of the political tension in this country, but instead it looks like things are going to continue escalating quickly. And it isn’t going to take very much at all to unleash major civil unrest. The left already hates Trump more than any other president in American history, and one really bad move could set off an explosion of anger unlike anything we have ever seen before.

A new lay group, Better Church Governance (bcg), has hired Mr Scala to probe the lives of the 224 men who advise Pope Francis (including their sex lives, if any). His particular focus will be the 124 who, were the pontiff to die tomorrow, would elect his successor. Mr Scala’s team of up to ten investigators will publish their findings on a website, alongside carefully screened information from the public. Philip Nielsen, bcg’s executive director, hopes the website, dubbed the Red Hat Report after the scarlet zucchetti (skullcaps) worn by cardinals, will be online within a month.

Though apparently well funded, the bcg is a tiny fragment of Christianity’s biggest church. Catholicism claims 1.3 billion followers and wields vast, global influence. Its report would have seemed unthinkably disrespectful, almost sacrilegious, even a year ago. But in the Catholic world much that was once inconceivable is now transpiring. The Red Hat Report is a sign of how much many Catholics have come to mistrust their leaders and how far some will go to hold them accountable.

In the ten years to 2010, the Vatican sifted through around 3,000 cases dating back to the middle of the previous century. Increasingly, however, attention has shifted to the role of bishops in covering up for clerics, often by posting them to other dioceses where they continued to abuse minors.

What’s vital to understand is that children’s fixation with gadgets and entertainment applications is by design. Actually, a relatively new concept called persuasive design. Persuasive design has been in the news a lot recently. Put simply, persuasive design is the practice of combining psychology and technology to change people’s behavior.

Gadgets and applications are developed by psychologists and other user experience (UX) researchers who apply behavioral change techniques to manipulate users. Persuasive design works by creating digital environments that users believe fulfill their basic human drives — to be social or obtain goals — better than real-world alternatives…

Two men are in the running: EPP leader in the European Parliament, Manfred Weber, and former Finnish Prime Minister Alexander Stubb. Conveniently, both have made videos that sum up their candidacies better than any policy pamphlet. In his glossy production, Manfred Weber goes back to his home town in Bavaria - the heartland of his party, the CSU. He talks about security and the need to protect the "European way of life" - one embodied by old buildings, scenic vistas and an all-white group of fifty-something political allies meeting in a wood-panelled restaurant.

Mr Stubb's effort is a compilation of pictures of him with young fans, being interviewed on the red carpets of the EU institutions, backed by Finland's version of Mumford and Sons. His motto is "Next Generation Europe" - presumably a generation that should be led by someone with a 14-year career featuring stints as a member of the European Parliament, head of government and vice-president of the European Investment Bank, and who is actually four years older than his rival.

Who gets to decide? Spitzenkandidat 2.0 is different. The European Parliament has agreed that it will endorse the person who commands a majority in a vote of MEPs when they return after May's elections.

The final decision is then made by EU leaders. They have agreed that they will not automatically appoint the Parliament's choice or necessarily someone who even stood as a spitzenkandidat in the first place. It could lead to a massive row or the job could go to someone else who is widely respected, has cultivated MEPs and happens to be available in the second half of the year.

"How about… Michel Barnier?!" goes the theory in Brussels. He has said that he is dedicated to his current job. However, he wasn't too busy to deliver an 80-minute speech about the future of Europe to the EU elite on Monday night.

Speaking on his LBC radio show, Mr Farage blasted: “A true European army says Emmanuel Macron, backing up comments from Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, who said not too long ago, deference to NATO can no longer be used as a convenient alibi to argue against greater European efforts. Folks, they’re building a European army, they’re not messing about.

“Isn’t it funny some Remoaners complained Boris put some numbers on a side of a bus and somehow, that was a terrible lie. Do you know something, they’ve been lying to us for 50 years about the true intentions of the European Union.” He later added: “These people really worry me. I think a European army is very very dangerous. What an insult, and what a worry this is for those that believe in co-operation with America and others in NATO.”

It doesn’t make sense, unless you consider the fact that most vaccines are just a “shot in the dark” – an experimental guess at certain viral strains, mixed with neurotoxins, carcinogens, allergens, other animal’s blood and cells, foreign proteins, all combined and injected into muscle tissue with chemical adjuvants in hopes of stimulating a hyper-immune response that’s sadly short-lived, if it even works at all.

In other words, if you’re afraid of unvaccinated children, then that must mean your vaccines don’t work. And that is exactly why herd “vaxxers” are still paranoid about anyone who doesn’t follow the rules of the “sheeple” and get every vaccine, booster jab, and flu shot that anyone tells them to get.

Consider another angle that exposes herd theory idiocy. Vaxxers all believe they are safe in the herd of people that get vaccinated, but most of that same “herd” supports open borders, where “herds” of thousands of illegal aliens in caravans flood into their city or town with viruses they’re not vaccinated against. American vaccine-manufacturing scientists, corporate shills, the media, and medical parrots (MDs and nurses that repeat the same illogical vaccine mottos) all want us to believe that the human immune system is naturally weak, and that if you catch any infectious disease that your likelihood of dying from it is very high.

Either you inherited your parent’s allergies, or millions of humans are simply allergic to injecting proteins, foreign animal blood cells, aborted baby blood cells, known carcinogens, and heavy metal toxins directly into their muscle tissue and blood, which would make perfect sense for any normal person with a perfectly functioning immune system.

Could vaccine food ingredients be the “inexplicable” reason millions of American children can’t even be in the same room where someone else opens a package of nuts? Consider this: Peanut oils were first used as carriers in influenza vaccines in the mid-1960s, thought to enhance the vaccine’s strength. Before that, anaphylactic shock “syndrome” from exposure to nuts was virtually nonexistent. Nobody was fainting and suffering from respiratory distress and experiencing convulsions just because somebody ate a Snickers bar on the other side of the room.

Today, peanut allergy is the #1 cause of death from food reactions, and it’s primarily among children. Coincidence? The reaction surge kicked into full force in the early 1990s. Is that because the mandated schedule of CDC-approved vaccines for children (before they turn age 7) doubled from the 1980s? It has more than doubled again since then! Take a look.

1980: 20 vaccines

1995: 40 vaccines

2011 – 2017: 68 vaccines (36 of those vaccines are administered before the age of 18 months)

That means nearly all of the vaccines given in the first 7 years of life in 1995 are now ALL given in the first 18 months of life. Maybe we should rename the top 8 food allergies “serum sickness.” Then the root cause would be realized and maybe doctors who actually understand nutrition (naturopaths) could step in and do something to reverse the “epidemic.”