NASA administrator Michael Griffin is drawing the ire of his agency's preeminent climate scientists after apparently downplaying the need to combat global warming.
In an interview broadcast this morning on National Public Radio's "Morning Edition" program, Griffin was asked by NPR's Steve Inskeep whether he is concerned about global warming.
"I have no doubt that a trend of global warming exists," Griffin told Inskeep. "I am not sure that it is fair to say that it is a problem we must wrestle with."
"To assume that it is a problem is to assume that the state of Earth's climate today is the optimal climate, the best climate that we could have or ever have had and that we need to take steps to make sure that it doesn't change," Griffin said. "I guess I would ask which human beings - where and when - are to be accorded the privilege of deciding that this particular climate that we have right here today, right now is the best climate for all other human beings. I think that's a rather arrogant position for people to take."
News media inquiries to NASA headquarters about Griffin's comments prompted the space agency to make the unusual move of issuing a news release late Wednesday night.
"NASA is the world's preeminent organization in the study of Earth and the conditions that contribute to climate change and global warming," Griffin said in a statement. "The agency is responsible for collecting data that is used by the science community and policy makers as part of an ongoing discussion regarding our planet's evolving systems. It is NASA's responsibility to collect, analyze and release information. It is not NASA's mission to make policy regarding possible climate change mitigation strategies. As I stated in the NPR interview, we are proud of our role and I believe we do it well."
DENIZLI, Turkey: The little red prayer book was handed out in a public primary school here in western Turkey earlier this month. It was small enough to fit in a pocket, but it carried a big message: Pray in the Muslim way. Get others to pray, too.
"The message was clear to me," said a retired civil servant, whose 13-year-old son, a student at the Yesilkoy Ibrahim Cengiz school, received the book. "This is not something that should be distributed in schools." This leafy, liberal city would seem like one of the least likely places to allow Islam to permeate public life. But for some residents, the book is part of a subtle shift toward increasingly public religiosity that has gone hand-in-hand with the ascent of the party of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
The phenomenon is complex: The party has not ordered changes, but sets examples through a growing network of observant teachers and public servants who have been hired since it came to power in 2002. The mayor, Nihat Zeybekci, a charismatic businessman and a member of Erdogan's party, strongly disputes claims that the party has limited freedoms. Alcohol is still sold near mosques. His party has women in local government. The opposition parties do not.
"I get offended when a lady says to me, 'When you have absolute control, will I still be able to swim at the beach?' " he said. "It's like asking if I'm a thief." But secular residents say that they see changes, and that they are the inevitable outcome of several decades of economic transformation. "In a very quiet, deep way, you can sense an Islamization," said Bedrettin Usanmaz, a jewelry shop owner in Denizli. "They're not after rapid change. They're investing for 50 years ahead."
But secular Turks argue that Islam will always seek more space in people's lives, and therefore should be reined in. They look to the military as secularism's final defender. "Islam is not like other religions," said Kadim Yildirim, a history teacher in Denizli from an opposition labor union. "It influences every part of your life, even your bedroom."
"Education is where the religious communities concentrate their efforts," said Gulay Keysan, a 31-year-old English teacher in Denizli. In a school in the city's Karaman district, where she taught several years ago, a quarter of her students lived in hostels.
Perhaps the most sensitive point for teachers like Yildirim are the changes they say are occurring in textbooks. Changes were already under way, part of an upgrade needed to join the European Union, but some officials say that as the nationalism is taken out, a new conservatism is being put in.
The newly released book "The Day of Islam: The Annihilation of America and the Western World," (Prometheus Books) paints a frightening picture of al-Qaida's nuclear ambitions.
Seasoned investigative reporter and former FBI consultant Paul Williams reveals the alarming potential for nuclear terrorism on U.S. soil and the sinister connections among organized crime, illegal immigrants, and al-Qaida.
Recently, FBI Director Robert Mueller, in an interview with NewsMax, confirmed Williams' main claim. Mueller said al-Qaida's paramount goal is clear: to detonate a nuclear device that would kill hundreds of thousands of Americans. Mueller told NewsMax that at times, the threat feels so real he lies awake at night thinking about the prospect.
Williams maintains that al-Qaida is not content on blowing up one nuclear device or even simply a "dirty" nuke, but wants to explode real nuclear devices in seven U.S. cities simultaneously. WILLIAMS SAYS THESE CITIES ARE NEW YORK, WASHINGTON, D.C., LAS VEGAS, MIAMI, BOSTON, HOUSTON, AND LOS ANGELES.
Mueller seems to confirm this claim of multiple attacks, saying both New York and Washington would be likely targets. Already Williams says the U.S. government has Washington webbed by "choke" points to detect nuclear material. Bin Laden and his adherents believe this nuclear cataclysm will usher in "The Day of Islam," the dream of radical Muslims to see all of humankind fall in submission before the throne of Allah as the "Great Satan," America, is brought to her knees.
Williams is not surprised at all that bin Laden has planned to launch such nuclear attacks, suggesting his delay is consistent with his past pattern of activities. For sure, it is a plan that has been long in its hatching.
China and India are both planning to launch moon shots within a year in the latest sign of the two Asian powerhouses' intensifying rivalry and growing technological prowess.
Although both countries deny they are engaged in a 21st century re-run of the 1960s race to the moon between the cold war superpowers, their haste to launch suggests more than casual interest in the other's progress.
China said this month that it expected to launch its first unmanned lunar orbiter, the Chang'e-1 (named after China's mythological (lady in the moon) before the end of this year, while India this week announced that it could send up a similar space probe as early as April 2008.
The two lunar programmes should be scientifically complementary, with Chinese scientists stressing Chang'e's goal of improving understanding of the geochemistry of the moon's surface and India focusing on three-dimensional mapping.
Under Beijing's three-stage plan, the Chang'e orbiter will be followed by a lunar landing and then by a mission to bring back rock and soil samples. India is building a two-legged robot for a possible follow-up mission to the moon's surface in 2011.However, the Chang'e programme will have to compete for resources with the high-profile manned space programme and Beijing's push to develop its military space assets.
Academics are calling for teachers to be banned from promoting marriage in the classroom.
They say homosexuality must be given equal status to stop the spread of "bigoted" attitudes in schools and university campuses. Current Government guidance on sex education says children must be taught "the importance of marriage for family life". Teachers are also permitted to voice their opposition to homosexuality if it stems from personal or religious conviction.
This allows faith schools to teach that same- sex relationships are at odds with their religion. But members of the University and College Union - representing 120,000 lecturers - are calling for a change in the law to stop teachers telling children that marriage is superior to gay partnerships. This would apply to all teachers, including staff in faith schools.
Delegates at the union's annual congress in Bournemouth were critical of recently-passed gay rights laws which failed to ban teachers from expressing personal views on homosexuality. They said the legislation, which is aimed at banning discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, did not go far enough. Delegates unanimously backed a motion demanding an end to "negative characterisations" of gay lifestyles.
The call is certain to infuriate religious groups. The Church of England is among faiths which lobbied the Government for gay rights laws to continue to allow Anglican schools to teach that the Bible forbids homosexuality. But Stephen Desmond, from Thames Valley University, told delegates: "WE MUST NEVER ALLOW FREEDOM OF RELIGION TO BE HIJACKED AND USED AS A PRETEXT TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST GAY AND LESBIAN TEENAGERS IN SCHOOLS."
As state and foreign governments enact forced phase-outs of incandescent light bulbs, consumers are being kept in the dark about the many downsides of compact fluorescent lamps, replacements being billed as an environmental and energy-savings panacea.
Across the U.S., schoolchildren are being urged to replace incandescent light bulbs in their homes. Businesses like Wal-Mart are also pushing CFLs hard, as are environmental groups. BUT SAFE DISPOSAL PLANS AND RECYCLING CENTERS FOR THE MERCURY-LADEN COMPACT FLUORESCENT LAMPS, SEEN AS THE FUTURE, LAG BEHIND THE HYPE.
While CFLs arguably use less energy and last longer than incandescents, there is one serious environmental drawback - the presence of small amounts of HIGHLY TOXIC MERCURY in each and every bulb. This poses problems for consumers when breakage occurs and for disposal when bulbs eventually do burn out.
Mercury is probably best-known for its effects on the nervous system. It can also damage the kidneys and liver, and in sufficient quantities can cause death. With an estimated 150 million CFLs sold in the United States in 2006 and with Wal-Mart alone projecting sales of 100 million this year, some scientists and environmentalists are worried far too many will wind up in garbage dumps. When sufficient mercury accumulates in a landfill, it can be emitted into the air and water in the form of vaporous methyl-mercury. From there, it can easily get into the food chain.
Consumers are discovering other downsides of CFLs besides convenience and safety issues:
-Most do not work with dimmer switches
-They are available in only a few sizes
-Some emit a bluish light
-Some people say they get headaches while working or reading under them
-They cannot be used in recessed lighting enclosures or enclosed globes
-Because they run hotter, fires are a possibility
When CFLs do burn out, they often create some smoke, which consumers have found alarming. This is a result of the plastic on the bulb's ballast melting and turning black. CFL manufacturers dismiss safety concerns.
Governments may indeed be promoting a kind of lighting that is itself nearly obsolete.
Fluorescent lights are nothing new. They've been around for a long time. And while they may save money, some say the public hasn't chosen them for good reasons - including, but not limited to, the mercury issue.
Some experts predict the next generation of lighting, though, is LED lights. They are made from semiconductor materials that emit light when an electrical current flows through them. When this form of light takes over, all bulbs will be obsolete. Your wall tiles can light up. Curtains and drapes can light up. Even your dining room table could be made to light up at exactly the level you want. And the best news is - no toxic waste.
That's what is ahead in the next decade, according to some in the industry.
Catholic politicians who defend abortion cannot expect to remain full members of the Church, Scotland's most senior Roman Catholic will warn.
In a sermon marking 40 YEARS SINCE THE ABORTION ACT, Cardinal Keith Patrick O'Brien will threaten to bar pro-choice politicians from taking Communion. He will urge voters at Edinburgh's St Mary's Cathedral to reject candidates who defend what he calls a social evil. The cardinal's opponents accuse him of using extreme, inflammatory language.They say it is up to elected officials to decide such ethical issues without facing threats from Church leaders.
The BBC's Robert Pigott says CARDINAL O'BRIEN IS FRUSTRATED BY WHAT HE SEES AS THE MARGINALISATION OF CHRISTIAN VALUES IN PUBLIC AFFAIRS. It is his boldest intervention yet in political life, our correspondent says.
HIS SERMON ATTACKS THE 1967 ACT, DESCRIBING THE ROUGHLY SEVEN MILLION ABORTIONS IN BRITAIN SINCE THEN AS AN "UNSPEAKABLE CRIME" AND THE "WANTON KILLING OF INNOCENTS".
The cardinal told the BBC: "We're told by statisticians that THE EQUIVALENT OF A CLASSROOM OF CHILDREN EVERY DAY ARE BEING ABORTED in their mothers' womb - basically murdered in their mothers' womb."
But his intervention has angered some politicians. Jeremy Purvis, a Liberal Democrat member of the Scottish Parliament, said the cardinal was using "inflammatory" language. HE SAID: "IT IS NOT RIGHT THAT WE WOULD BE SEEN TO BE PUT UNDER PRESSURE, OR INDEED SOME MEMBERS THREATENED, BY A RELIGIOUS LEADER ON WHAT IS A VERY SENSITIVE ISSUE."
Is the solution to America's energy needs as simple as a trip to the beach? The idea is a fascinating one as a Florida man searching for a cancer cure may have stumbled onto a virtually limitless source of energy: salt water.
John Kanzius, 63, is a broadcast engineer who formerly owned several TV and radio stations, before retiring in Sanibel Island, Fla.
Five years ago, he was diagnosed with a severe form of leukemia, and began a quest to find a kinder, gentler way to treat the disease compared to harsh chemotherapy.
In October 2003, he had an epiphany: kill cancer with radio waves. He then devised a machine that emits radio waves in an attempt to slay cancerous cells, while leaving healthy cells unharmed. His experiments in fighting cancer have become so successful, one physician was quoted as saying, "We could be getting close to grabbing the Holy Grail."
But in the midst of his experiments as he was trying to take salt out of water, Kanzius discovered his machine could do what some may have thought was impossible: making water burn. The possible ramifications of the discovery are almost mind-boggling, as cars could be fueled by salt water instead of gasoline, hydroelectric plants could be built along the shore, and homes could be heated without worrying about supplies of oil.
Kanzius has partnered with Charles Rutkowski, general manager of Industrial Sales and Manufacturing, a Millcreek, Pa., company that builds the radio-wave generators.
"I've done this [burning experiment] countless times and it still amazes me," Rutkowski told the Erie Times-News. "Here we are paying $3 a gallon for gas, and this is a device that seems to turn salt water into an alternative fuel."
Kanzius has been told it's actually hydrogen that's burning, as his machine generates enough heat to break down the chemical bond between hydrogen and oxygen that makes up water. "I have never heard of such a thing," Alice Deckert, Ph.D., chairwoman of Allegheny College's chemistry department, told the Times-News. "There doesn't seem to be enough energy in radio waves to break the chemical bonds and cause that kind of reaction."
Kanzius said he hasn't decided whether to share his fuel discovery with government or private business, though he'd prefer a federal grant to develop it. "I'm afraid that if I join up with some big energy company, they will say it doesn't work and shelve it, even if it does work," Kanzius told the paper.
Freak snow, freezing temperatures and tropical storms across Europe are making the Bank Holiday washout here look almost pleasant. In Spitzing in Germany, locals have been forced to wrap up after ten centimetres of snow brought out the snowploughs for the first time this year.
It was the same story in towns close to the Alps in Austria, Switzerland and even northern Italy where temperatures in May routinely climb into the 80s. In one Swiss valley, 3,000 were trapped in hotels and guest houses because trains could not reach them in the snow. Ironically, the weather follows one of the worst winters ever for snow at Alpine ski resorts.
On the Mediterranean island of Corsica, two hikers died in freezing fog and on its beaches a 19-year-old man was killed by a wave. Further north in cities like Berlin, tropical storms have brought four days of chaos, dumping hailstones as big as golf balls, uprooting trees and causing widespread flooding. There have been many fatalities across Germany from the weather, the most poignant being three workmen who sheltered beneath their bulldozer during a rainstorm only to die altogether from a single lightning strike.
Britain was drenched over the weekend in some of the worst rain of the year. The AA said thousands had to cut their long weekends short, to battle appalling conditions on motorways. Arctic winds hit the country on Monday at speeds of up to 50mph in what was described as one of the coldest Whitsun Bank Holidays.
MOSCOW (AP) - Russia tested new missiles Tuesday that a Kremlin official boasted could penetrate any defense system, and President Vladimir Putin warned that U.S. plans for an anti-missile shield in Europe would turn the region into a "powder keg."
First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said Russia tested an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of carrying multiple independent warheads, and it also successfully conducted a "preliminary" test of a tactical cruise missile that he said could fly farther than existing, similar weapons.
"As of today, Russia has new tactical and strategic complexes that are capable of overcoming any existing or future missile defense systems," Ivanov said, according to the ITAR-Tass news agency. "So in terms of defense and security, Russians can look calmly to the country's future."
Ivanov is a former defense minister seen as a potential Kremlin favorite to succeed Putin next year. Both he and Putin have said repeatedly that Russia would continue to improve its nuclear arsenals and respond to U.S. plans to deploy a missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic - NATO nations that were in Moscow's front yard during the Cold War as Warsaw Pact members.
The super-secret Bilderberg Group, an organization of powerful international elites, is set to meet this week somewhere in Turkey - but even the precise location is a mystery. The meeting begins Thursday and continues through Sunday.
Those expected to attend include DONALD GRAHAM, chairman and chief executive officer of the Washington Post, RICHARD N. HAASS, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, HENRY KISSINGER, DAVID ROCKEFELLER, JOHN VINOCUR, senior correspondent of the International Herald Tribune, PAUL GIGOT, editor of the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal, NICHOLAS BEYTOUT, editor-in-chief of Le Figaro, GEORGE DAVID, chairman of Coca-Cola, MARTIN FELDSTEIN, president and chief executive officer of the National Bureau of Economic Research, TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, president and chief executive officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, VERNON JORDAN, senior managing director of Lazard Freres & Co., ANATOLE KALETSKY, editor at large of the Times of London and GENERAL WILLIAM LUTI, THE NEW "WAR CZAR."
According to reports from Turkey, Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions and global energy issues will be on the agenda - but only invitees know for sure. Welcome to the mysterious world of secret societies.
Since 1954, the Bilderberg group has convened government, business, academic and journalistic representatives from the U.S., Canada and Europe with the express purpose of exploring the future of the North Atlantic community. The first meeting was held at the Hotel de Bilderberg in the Netherlands - thus the name.
According to sources that have penetrated the high-security meetings in the past, the Bilderberg meetings emphasize a globalist agenda and promote the idea that the notion of national sovereignty is antiquated and regressive. "It's officially described as a private gathering," noted a BBC report in 2003, "but with a guest list including the heads of European and American corporations, political leaders and a few intellectuals, it's one of the most influential organizations on the planet."
But, counter participants, the secrecy is not evidence of a grand conspiracy, but only an opportunity to speak frankly with other world leaders out of the limelight of press coverage and its inevitable repercussions. "There's absolutely nothing in it," argues the UK's Lord Denis Healey, one of the four founders of Bilderberg. "We never sought to reach a consensus on the big issues at Bilderberg," he told the BBC. "It's simply a place for discussion."
The polemical journalist Christopher Hitchens is more read in America than in his native UK but that is about to change with his vitriolic new book attacking religion
GOD IS NOT GREAT: Why Religion Poisons Everything, although sweeping in its erudition, is a righteous harangue. When Ruth Gledhill of The Times recently interviewed Richard Dawkins about his scientific debunking of faith, The God Delusion, she found him less angry than his confrontational writing style suggested. But Hitchens is never far below boiling point. He is an evangelical secularist, an atheist warlord.
"RELIGION", HE WRITES, "IS VIOLENT, IRRATIONAL, INTOLERANT, ALLIED TO RACISM AND TRIBALISM AND BIGOTRY, INVESTED IN IGNORANCE AND HOSTILE TO FREE INQUIRY, CONTEMPTUOUS OF WOMEN AND COERCIVE TOWARD CHILDREN".
"Marx says criticism of religion is the beginning of all criticism," Hitchens says. "Philosophy starts where religion ends, just as chemistry starts where alchemy breaks off or astronomy starts where astrology runs out. It is the necessary argument. Not believing in the supernatural is the critical thing."
And yet, I suggest, doesn't it fulfil one function, an innate human desire for ritual? We are soothed by lighting candles or familiar hymns. Secularism, for all its logic, offers no substitute. Surprisingly, Hitchens agrees. "But I don't do Christmas because I can't stand it." What, no presents? "Well, you have to . . . A tree? Er, yup. We went to Kmart and bought a white tinsel one. Actually it's rather beautiful. Our annual ritual is screwing it together."
He was married to his first wife in a Greek Orthodox church, to his second, Carol Blue, by a rabbi. He had his son, Alexander, now 23, baptised. He educates his daughter, Antonia, 13, at a Quaker school, Sidwell Friends, alma mater of Chelsea Clin ton and Al Gore's son. He has taken her to Washington's Anglican cathedral to familiarise her with the liturgy. He worries that without the scriptures "which he can quote chapter and verse" she will never understand Milton or Shakespeare.
"The point is" he says, "religion should be private: I am not paying my taxes to support it. I'm not going to have children taught that metaphysical things are true. America, where secular education has come under protracted attack from Creationists, is the territory of contestation at the momen".
People [in the US] are fed up with the presumption of the religious and the demands they expect to have met. THERE ARE MANY, MANY MORE NONBELIEVERS AND SCEPTICS IN THE STATES AND THEY'VE JUST ABOUT HAD ENOUGH.
(God Is Not Great, by Christopher Hitchens, is published by Atlantic Books)
MINISTERS would be wrong to opt out of European human rights rules in order to strengthen anti-terrorism laws, the government's security watchdog said yesterday.
Lord Carlile, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, spoke out against a threat from John Reid, the Home Secretary, after three terrorist suspects absconded despite being under control orders intended to restrict their movements. Mr Reid last week said he was prepared to "derogate" from the European Convention on Human Rights in order to impose tougher control orders, placing terrorist suspects under effective house arrest. Such sweeping orders have been ruled illegal by the High Court.
Lord Carlile, a QC who is given access to secret intelligence material, yesterday told a Whitehall security conference that it should be possible for Mr Reid to get his way without opting out of the convention. The control order laws should be "clarified" to reduce judges' scope to resist ministers' wishes, Lord Carlile suggested. He said: "Some statutory clarity should be considered to ensure that ministers can impose appropriate and effective controls."
Mr Reid is said to be open to a consensual approach, but that derogation remains an option. But Lord Carlile said: "It would lead to lengthy and testy litigation, and an unwelcome and scarring clash with the senior judiciary which, on balance, the judiciary would be likely to win."
CARDINAL Keith O'Brien has attacked Britain's abortion legislation for being a "pack of lies", as official figures show the number of terminations in Scotland has hit a record high.
The leader of the Catholic Church in Scotland denounced assurances made when the 1967 Abortion Act was passed - THAT ABORTION WOULD BE ALLOWED ONLY IN EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES - SAYING THEY WERE "LIES AND MISINFORMATION MASQUERADING AS COMPASSION AND TRUTH".
He says: "We were told that backstreet abortions were killing women and had to be decriminalised. We were told abortion would only be used in extreme cases. "We were told medical scrutiny would be rigorous. We were told lies and misinformation masquerading as compassion and truth." He went on to say that for many women abortions have become an alternative form of birth control.
The battle by David (now Lord) Steel, a Scottish Liberal, to legalise abortion proved to be the most controversial battle of his political life. HE WAS PARTLY INSPIRED BY A CHURCH OF ENGLAND REPORT WHICH ARGUED FOR ITS MODERATE USE AND HE EVEN ATTENDED AN ABORTION.
Introduced as a private member's bill, LORD STEEL'S MOVE WAS BACKED BY THE GOVERNMENT AND WAS PASSED ON 27 OCTOBER, 1967, coming into effect on 27 April, 1968. The act made abortion legal in the UK up to 28 weeks gestation, amended in 1990 to 24 weeks.
An American member of al-Qaida warned President Bush on Tuesday to end U.S. involvement in all Muslim lands or face an attack worse than the Sept. 11 suicide assault, according to a new videotape.
Wearing a white robe and a turban, Adam Yehiye Gadahn, who also goes by the name Azzam al-Amriki, said al-Qaida would not negotiate on its demands.
"Your failure to heed our demands means that you and your people will experience things which will make you forget all about the horrors of September 11th, Afghanistan and Iraq and Virginia Tech," he said in the seven-minute video.
Gadahn, who has been charged in a U.S. treason indictment with aiding al-Qaida, spoke in English and the video carried Arabic subtitles. The video appeared on a Web site often used by Islamic militants and carried the logo of al-Qaida's media wing, as-Sahab.
Gadahn, who appeared in an al-Qaida video last September in which he called on Americans to convert to Islam, demanded that Bush remove all U.S. military and spies from Islamic countries, free all Muslims from U.S. prisons and end support for Israel. He said a withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq alone would not satisify al-Qaida.
Today we find the Church of God in a “wilderness of religious confusion!”
The confusion is not merely around the Church – within the religions of the world outside – but WITHIN the very heart of The True Church itself!
Read online or contact email to request a copy